banner



What Determines The Method Used To Repair An Aneurysim?

Cognitive Aneurysme | American Association of Neurological Surgeons

A cerebral or intracranial aneurysm is an abnormal focal dilation of an artery in the encephalon that results from a weakening of the inner muscular layer (the intima) of a blood vessel wall. The vessel develops a "blister-similar" dilation that can become thin and rupture without alert. The resultant bleeding into the space effectually the brain is chosen a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This kind of hemorrhage can lead to a stroke, coma and/or death.

Aneurysms are usually institute at the base of operations of the encephalon just inside the skull, in an expanse called the subarachnoid space. In fact, 90 percent of SAHs are attributed to ruptured cerebral aneurysms and the two terms are often used synonymously.

Aneurysms range in size, from pocket-size – about 1/8 inch – to nearly 1 inch. Aneurysms larger than i inch are called giant aneurysms, pose a particularly high hazard and are difficult to treat. The verbal mechanisms past which cerebral aneurysms develop, grow and rupture are unknown.

However, a number of factors are believed to contribute to the formation of cerebral aneurysms, including:

  • Hypertension (high blood pressure)
  • Cigarette smoking
  • Built (genetic) predisposition
  • Injury or trauma to blood vessels
  • Complication from some types of blood infections

Patients with intracranial aneurysms can present with SAH from aneurysmal rupture or with un-ruptured aneurysms, which may accept been discovered incidentally or resulted in neurological symptoms. An aneurysm ruptures when a pigsty develops in the sac of the aneurysm. The hole can exist small, in which case simply a small amount of claret leaks, or large, leading to a major hemorrhage. An united nations-ruptured aneurysm is the one whose sac has not previously leaked. Every year approximately xxx,000 patients in the U.S. suffer from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, and upwardly to 6 percent of the population may have an un-ruptured cerebral aneurysm.

A series of 111 patients with un-ruptured aneurysms showed:

  • 51 percent with asymptomatic aneurysms
  • 17 percent with astute symptomatology — such as ischemia (37% of aneurysms)
  • Headache (37 percent of aneurysms)
  • Seizures (18 percent of aneurysms)
  • Cranial neuropathies (12 percent of aneurysms)
  • Chronic symptomatology (32 percent) which included headache (51%)
  • Visual deficits (29 percent)
  • Weakness (11 percent) and
  • Facial pain (nine percent)

The management of both ruptured and un-ruptured cerebral aneurysms poses a significant challenge for patients and their treating physicians (ane).

There is lilliputian dubiety on the treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms, which are typically secured with clips or coils to prevent re-rupture. Occasionally if the patients' neurological status is poor on presentation, they have multiple medical co-morbidities, especially in the elderly age group, and the chances of significant recovery seem low, the treating dr. may non recommend ambitious management. The 'Hunt and Hess grading scale,' introduced in 1968, is generally used at most neurosurgical centers to classify the severity of SAH based on the patient's clinical condition.

The worse the patients' neurological status, the higher is the grade (2):

  1. Asymptomatic, mild headache, slight nuchal rigidity (neck stiffness)
  2. Moderate to severe headache, nuchal rigidity, cranial nerve palsy, no other neurological deficit
  3. Drowsiness / confusion, mild focal neurologic deficit
  4. Stupor, moderate-severe hemiparesis
  5. Coma, extensor posturing

The treatment for un-ruptured cognitive aneurysms has been a matter of argue for decades. In the largest study on the management of un-ruptured aneurysms "International written report of unruptured intracranial aneurysms" (ISUIA), the 5-year cumulative rupture rates for patients without a history of SAH and with aneurysms in anterior apportionment were 0 percent, 2.half-dozen per centum, 14.v per centum and 40 percent for aneurysms <7 mm, 7–12 mm, 13–24 mm, and > 25 mm, respectively.

For posterior circulation and posterior communicating avenue aneurysms these rates were higher: 2.5 percent; xiv.5 percent, 18.4 percent and 50 percent for <7 mm, 7–12 mm, 13–24 mm, and > 25 mm, respectively. The report suggested that aneurysms < 7 mm in the anterior circulation accept 0.05 pct risk of rupture and should be observed. This written report could not make recommendations regarding the modality of treatment because the characteristics of patients in the endovascular cohort differed profoundly from those in the surgical group (three).

This study has been criticized for selection bias and written report design. In clinical practice SAH from aneurysms smaller than 7 mm is non infrequently encountered. Over the years a number of factors have been reported which tin influence rupture rates of the aneurysms. Factors such as family history of intracranial aneurysms, history of smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, female sex, previous SAH, symptomatic aneurysm, its location and size have shown negative correlations. Besides these factors, a patient's life expectancy and medical co-morbidities are as well taken into account with discussing the direction options (4).

In 2007, based on the critical assay of the literature available at that time Komotar et al (4) recommended that:

  • with rare exceptions, all symptomatic un-ruptured aneurysms should be treated;
  • minor, incidental aneurysms less than five mm in diameter should exist managed conservatively in nigh all cases;
  • aneurysms larger than 5 mm in patients younger than 60 years of age should be seriously considered for treatment;
  • large, incidental aneurysms larger than 10 mm should be treated in near all patients younger than seventy years of age.

Broadly, three treatment options for people with the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysm include:

  • medical (non-surgical) therapy
  • surgical therapy or clipping and
  • endovascular therapy or coiling with or without adjunctive devices

Medical therapy is ordinarily simply an option for the handling of un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Strategies include smoking cessation and blood pressure control. These are the only factors that have been shown to have a meaning upshot on aneurysm germination, growth and/or rupture. Both patient and doctor can work together to design an individualized smoking abeyance program that is both practical and viable for the patient's lifestyle. In addition, if suffering from loftier blood pressure, the doctor may cull to start you on an anti-hypertensive (blood pressure lowering) medication and/or diet and exercise program. Finally, periodic radiographic imaging (either MRA, CT browse or conventional angiography) may be recommended at intervals to monitor the size and/or growth of the aneurysm. Considering the mechanisms of aneurysm rupture are incompletely understood, and because even aneurysms of very small size may rupture, the role of serial imaging for cognitive aneurysm is undefined.

In 1937, Walter Dandy, Doc, a famous American neurosurgeon, introduced the method of "clipping" an aneurysm when he practical a V-shaped, silver clip to the cervix of an internal carotid avenue aneurysm. Since that time, aneurysm clips have evolved into hundreds of varieties, shapes and sizes. The mechanical sophistication of available clips, along with the appearance of the operating microscope in the 1960s have made surgical clipping the gilt standard in the treatment of both ruptured and un-ruptured cerebral aneurysms. In spite of these advances, surgical clipping remains an invasive and technically challenging procedure.

An aneurysm is clipped through a craniotomy, which is a surgical procedure in which the brain and the claret vessels are accessed through an opening in the skull. Afterwards the aneurysm is identified, it is advisedly dissected (separated) from the surrounding encephalon tissue. A small-scale metal clip (ordinarily made from titanium) is and so applied to the cervix (base) of the aneurysm. Aneurysm clips come up in all different shapes and sizes, and the selection of a particular clip is based on the size and location of an aneurysm. The clip has a bound mechanism which allows the two "jaws" of the clip to shut around either side of the aneurysm, thus occluding (separating) the aneurysm from the parent (origin) blood vessel. In the platonic clipping, normal claret vessel beefcake is physically restored past excluding the aneurysm sac from the cerebral circulation.

Endovascular techniques for treating aneurysms date back to the 1970s with the introduction of proximal balloon occlusion by Fjodor A. Serbinenko, MD, a Russian neurosurgeon. During the 1980s, endovascular treatment of aneurysms with balloon occlusions was associated with high procedural rate of rupture and complications. Guido Guglielmi, MD, an American-based neuroradiologist, invented the platinum detachable microcoil, which was used to treat the start human being being in 1991. The development of Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs), and their FDA blessing in 1995, revolutionized endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

The common goal of both surgical clipping and endovascular coiling is to eliminate blood menstruation into the aneurysm. Efficacy (long-term success or effectiveness of the treatment) is measured past prove of aneurysm obliteration (failure to be demonstrated by conventional or noninvasive angiography), without evidence of recanalization (whatever blood menstruum into the aneurysm) or recurrence (reappearance).

Guglielmi detachable coils, known every bit GDCs, are soft wire spirals originally made out of platinum. These coils are deployed (released) into an aneurysm via a microcatheter that is inserted through the femoral artery of the leg and advisedly advanced into the brain. The microcatheter is selectively advanced into the aneurysm itself, and the microcoils are released in a sequential style. Once the coils are released into the aneurysm, the blood menses pattern within the aneurysm is altered, and the deadening or sluggish remaining blood flow leads to a thrombosis (clot) of the aneurysm. A thrombosed aneurysm resists the entry of liquid claret, providing a seal in a style similar to a clip.

Endovascular coiling is an attractive option for treating aneurysms considering it does non require opening of the skull, and is generally accomplished in a shorter time frame, which lessens the anesthesia given. Nevertheless, important differences remain between clipping and coiling, including the nature of the seal created. Considering coiling does not physically re-estimate the inner blood vessel lining (endothelium), recanalization may occur through the eventual compaction of the coils into the aneurysm by the bloodstream.

One of the largest, randomized controlled trials comparing surgical clipping and endovascular coiling — International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) — randomly allocated the patients to either neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling afterward a SAH. In the start report published in 2002, 2,143 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the endovascular coiling group and the surgical clipping group. They concluded that survival (free of disability) at one year was meliorate with endovascular coiling. Long-term risk of further bleeding from treated aneurysm was depression with either therapy, but higher with endovascular coiling, as compared to surgical clipping (5).

The investigators recently published the long-term outcomes from 1,644 patients enrolled from 22 U.K. neurosurgical centers who were followed upwardly for x–18.5 years for decease and clinical outcomes. At long-term follow-up rates of increased dependency solitary did non differ between groups, the probability of death or dependency was significantly greater in the neurosurgical group and re-bleeding was more than likely subsequently endovascular coiling (vi).

However, this written report, like many other stroke trials, has many shortcomings and should be interpreted with caution (7). Meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing endovascular coiling and surgical clipping (including ISAT) conducted later were unable to testify a pregnant difference betwixt endovascular handling and neurosurgical clipping in mortality and reported that endovascular treatment was associated with higher rates of re-bleeding (8, 9).

Oftentimes endovascular coiling may demand to be performed with stent — or balloon assistance — for complex aneurysms such as wide-necked aneurysms with lower dome-to-neck ratios, big and behemothic aneurysms. Stent — or balloon-assisted coiling — is done to prevent herniation of the scroll mass into the parent avenue which can effect in stroke. For balloon-assisted coiling, the balloon is temporarily inflated at the neck of the aneurysm while the coils are placed into the aneurysm. For stent-assisted coiling, the stent is permanently placed across the aneurysm neck. There are advantages and disadvantages of both approaches.

The patients who take the stent placed need to be on anti-platelets medications, limiting their apply in ruptured aneurysms, although stent-assisted coiling has been used in ruptured aneurysms with good outcomes. Stents accept besides been shown to reduce aneurysm recanalization and result in farther occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms (10, 11). A literature review on stent-assisted coiling in 2022 reported the overall complication rate of xix per centum with an overall death charge per unit of ii.1 percent (12).

Flow diverter (FD) stents were introduced about 7 years ago into the clinical armamentarium of the neuro-interventionists as an additional tool for aneurysm treatment. They have higher metal surface area coverage (about xxx-35 percent) every bit compared to the previous generation stents which have nearly 8-10 per centum metal surface-expanse coverage (13).

FDs are tubular stent-like implants with a low porosity (metal-free to metal-covered area) and a high pore density with two master work mechanisms (14):

  • Menses diversion: Every bit the proper name indicates, FDs bridge the aneurysm neck and divert the blood flow away from the aneurysm sac, due to impedance created past the mesh of the implant. Reduction of the blood menstruation into the aneurysmal sac causes stasis of blood period inside the aneurysm which then leads to an inflammatory response followed by thrombosis and "healing" of the aneurysm.
  • Endoluminal reconstruction of the parent avenue: The FD provides a scaffold for neo-endothelialization across the aneurysm neck and results in endoluminal reconstruction of the parent artery excluding the aneurysm from the circulation.

FD stents clinically available at the current fourth dimension include:

  • Pipeline Embolization Device (EV3-MTI, Irvine, CA)
  • Silk (Balt, Montmorency, France)
  • Surpass (Stryker, Fremont, CA)
  • and Menstruation Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) (Microvention, Tustin, CA)

Pipeline embolization device (PED) is currently used most often in the U.Southward. and most of the literature on catamenia-diversion for intracranial aneurysms is based on its use. The PED is a flexible microcatheter-delivered self-expanding cylindric construct composed of 48 braided strands of cobalt chromium and platinum. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the PED for the treatment of large or giant wide-necked intracranial aneurysms from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA), which is a section of the artery that supplies the claret to the brain. (15) Over the concluding few years, PED has as well been used across the FDA approved indications equally an "off-label device" with good outcomes. (16)

The concept behind the treatment is the same with all four FDs. Flow diversion is generally performed for the treatment of aneurysms that are challenging and less amenable to traditional endovascular coiling; such as complex aneurysms, including large and behemothic aneurysms, wide-neck aneurysms, fusiform aneurysms and recanalized aneurysms after previous coiling. Stent-assisted coiling and airship-assisted coiling are alternative endovascular options for such aneurysms; however, some studies reported their limited efficacy due to high recanalization rates (12).

Dual antiplatelet therapy with Plavix (Clopidogrel) and aspirin (ASA) is recommended starting prior to the placement of the device and continued later on for three to six months followed past aspirin monotherapy lifelong. That is why almost aneurysms treated are un-ruptured although in that location are cases where they were used for ruptured aneurysms likewise. Most centers all the same limit their use to the un-ruptured aneurysms. For adequate anticoagulation (and to lower the thromboembolic complications) prior to device placement, Plavix assays are checked at baseline earlier the administration of Plavix and then again just before the procedure. The percentage of inhibition is calculated and the dosage is adjusted to achieve acceptable platelet inhibition before the procedure. Patients with resistance to Plavix are switched to a different anti-platelet drug.

After the routine groin access and placement of a sheath, the microcatheter is navigated inside the larger guide catheter to the desired position across the aneurysm cervix. FD stent is so passed through the microcatheter and deployed across the aneurysm neck carefully under the angiographic guidance.

The coils don't need to exist packed as tightly, if at all, as in traditional aneurysmal coiling, which decreases the chances of mass effect from the big aneurysms (fourteen). The results from the large retrospective and prospective unmarried- and multi-center studies take shown an excellent feasibility of the treatment with a high efficacy and acceptable periprocedural complications (occurring presently before, during or subsequently the performance of a medical procedure) every bit well as morbidity and mortality rates (17,xviii).

Besides the of import complications such as thromboembolic events and the intra-procedural aneurysm rupture, which are as well seen with traditional aneurysm coiling, other complications seen with the use of FDs include delayed aneurysmal rupture causing hemorrhage and distant (away from aneurysm) intraparenchymal hemorrhage. The mechanisms for delayed hemorrhage and afar intraparenchymal hemorrhage are not well understood. The hypotheses suggested include the inflammation associated with thrombus formation weakens the aneurysmal wall causing rupture or the hemodynamic changes inside the aneurysm causing stress and rupture (xiv).

From the Retrospective Assay of Delayed Aneurysm Ruptures (RADAR) report analysis, delayed aneurysms rupture later FDs use occurred in ane.0 pct of patients and delayed parenchymal hemorrhage was reported in ane.9 per centum of patients (19).

Intrasaccular flow disruption with a Spider web device is 1 of the latest technological advancements in management of wide-necked aneurysms especially at the bifurcation of an avenue. The Spider web device is placed within an aneurysm in contrast to the FDs which are placed in the parent avenue. Ane of the biggest advantages is the reduced demand for antiplatelet medications, specially for the ruptured aneurysms, which is particularly helpful in patients with SAH. The clinical feel with its apply is currently limited; however, the preliminary retrospective multicenter series reported 100 percentage technical feasibility, 4.8 percent morbidity and 0 percentage mortality (20). The WEB device is not FDA-approved in the United states.

Surgical clipping of a cerebral aneurysm is always performed past a neurosurgeon, often 1 with expertise in cerebrovascular affliction. Most cerebrovascular neurosurgeons have had five to 7 years of full general neurosurgery grooming and an additional ane to two years of specialized cerebrovascular training.

Endovascular coiling is washed either by a neurosurgeon or by an interventional neuroradiologist. An interventional radiologist has undergone extensive training (three to v years) in both radiology and interventional (invasive) procedures involving the brain and spinal cord. All neurosurgeons that perform endovascular coiling have undergone additional training in endovascular techniques in add-on to total neurosurgery grooming (v to seven years of residency).

Although the frequencies of certain complications vary co-ordinate to the intervention, both clipping and coiling share the aforementioned complications. Rupture of the aneurysm is 1 of the well-nigh serious complications seen in either process. Verbal frequencies of ruptures are non well documented, simply reported rupture rates range from two percent to 3 percent for both coiling and clipping. Rupture can cause massive intracerebral hemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke or bleeding into the encephalon) and subsequent coma or death. Although rupture can have catastrophic consequences during either procedure, surgery probably provides a better opportunity to control hemorrhage because of direct admission to the ruptured aneurysm and the supplying vessels.

Ischemic stroke (stroke secondary to decreased claret oxygen) is another serious complication frequently encountered in both clipping and coiling. The design and distribution of strokes varies according to the aneurysm location and procedure type.

The actual length of the procedure, the associated risks, the projected recovery time and the expected prognosis (outcome) depend on both the location of the aneurysm, the presence/severity of hemorrhage and the patient'due south underlying medical condition. Therefore, each individual case should exist discussed with the treating neurosurgeon/physician.

The treatment of choice for an intracranial aneurysm, like all medical decisions, should be agreed upon by both the dr. and the patient. In the case of either ruptured or un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms, the treating physician should discuss the risks and benefits of each available treatment option. The doc volition usually make recommendations for one treatment over some other, depending on the facts of each individual case. Seeking a second opinion, when possible, is usually advisable.

Although unresolved controversies remain every bit to what the all-time treatment option is for an individual patient, both surgical clipping and endovascular coiling/stenting are considered to be viable treatment options in the management of cerebral aneurysms today.

  1. Raps EC, Rogers JD, Galetta SL, Solomon RA, Lennihan L, Klebanoff LM, Fink ME: The clinical spectrum of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Arch Neurol 50:265–268, 1993.
  2. Hunt We, Hess RM. "Surgical risk every bit related to fourth dimension of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms." Journal of Neurosurgery 1968 January;28(1):xiv-xx.
  3. Wiebers Practice, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, Forbes GS, Thielen G, Nichols D, O'Fallon WM, Peacock J, Jaeger L, Kassell NF, Kongable-Beckman GL, Torner JC; International Report of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical issue, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):103-10.
  4. Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Solomon RA.Guidelines for the surgical handling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the showtime annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium--controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jan;62(ane):183-93; give-and-take 193-iv.
  5. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke One thousand, Shrimpton J, Holman R; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 October 26;360(9342):1267-74.
  6. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS.The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-upward of the Great britain cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Lancet. 2022 Oct 28. pii: S0140-6736(14)60975-2.
  7. Ajith J Thomas, Christopher Due south Ogilvy. ISAT: equipoise in treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms? Lancet. 2022 Oct 28. pii: S0140-6736(14)61736-0.
  8. Lanzino G, Murad MH, d'Urso PI, Rabinstein AA. Roll embolization versus clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled published studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 34: 1764–68.
  9. Li H, Pan R, Wang H, et al. Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-assay. Stroke 2022; 44: 29–37.
  10. Lawson MF, Newman WC, Chi YY, Mocco JD, Hoh BL. Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms.Neurosurgery. 2022 Sep;69(3):598-603; give-and-take 603-4.
  11. Fargen KM, Hoh BL, Welch BG, Pride GL, Lanzino G, Boulos AS, Carpenter JS, Rai A, Veznedaroglu Eastward, Ringer A, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Kan P, Siddiqui A, Levy EI, Mocco J. Long-term results of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2022 Aug;71(2):239-44; give-and-take 244.
  12. Shapiro Yard, Becske T, Sahlein D, Babb J, Nelson PK. Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: a literature survey of treatment and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;33:159–163.
  13. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D.The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):34-40.
  14. Pierot Fifty, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke. 2022 Jul;44(7):2046-54.
  15. Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman KM, Binning MJ, Dumont TM, Ogilvy CS, Gaughen JR Jr, Mocco J, Velat GJ, Ringer AJ, Welch BG, Horowitz MB, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Early postmarket results afterward handling of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a U.South. multicenter feel. Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec;71(6):1080-7; discussion 1087-8.
  16. Kulcsár Z, Wetzel SG, Augsburger L, Gruber A, Wanke I, Rüfenacht DA. Issue of menses diversion treatment on very small-scale ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2022 Sep;67(3):789-93.
  17. Piano M1, Valvassori L, Quilici Fifty, Pero G, Boccardi E. Midterm and long-term follow-upward of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a unmarried-centre experience.J Neurosurg. 2022 February;118(2):408-16.
  18. O'Kelly CJ, Spears J, Grub K, Wong J, Boulton M, Weill A, et al. Canadian feel with the pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;34:381–387.
  19. Kulcsar Z, Szikora I. The ESMINT Retrospective Analysis of Delayed Aneurysm Ruptures after menstruum diversion (RADAR) study. EJMINT. 2022.
  20. Pierot L, Liebig T, Sychra Five, Kadziolka K, Dorn F, Strasilla C, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption: a new endovascular arroyo for the handling of intracranial aneurysms. Results of a preliminary clinical evaluation in a multicenter series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;33:1232–1238.
  • The Brain Aneurysm Foundation
  • American Stroke Association

The AANS does not endorse any treatments, procedures, products or physicians referenced in these patient fact sheets. This information is provided equally an educational service and is non intended to serve as medical advice. Anyone seeking specific neurosurgical communication or assistance should consult his or her neurosurgeon, or locate one in your area through the AANS' Find a Board-certified Neurosurgeon"online tool.

Source: https://www.aans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Cerebral-Aneurysm

Posted by: moodytheregoth.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Determines The Method Used To Repair An Aneurysim?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel